GeForce 8800 GT vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GT
336
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+444%
1828
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GM206
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
