Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

GeForce 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 840M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce 840M Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (33W vs 65W)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 840M
863
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile +60%
1385
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 840M
497
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile +197%
1477
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce 840M
110
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile +322%
465

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 800M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
384
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.31 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.62 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1385 GFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1385 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
86.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Polaris 23
N15S-GT
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net