GeForce 410M vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 410M Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
110
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+11709%
12990
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 410M
72
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+9872%
7180
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 400M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
24
48
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
12W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
AD107
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
