GeForce 210 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 96GB VRAM RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 600W)
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2617MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
24048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
+322976%
126000
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Mar 2025
GeForce 200
Generation
Blackwell PRO W
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1590 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2617 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
188
16
Shading Units
24064
8
TMUs
752
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
752
-
RT Cores
188
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
502.5 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1968 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
126.0 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
126.0 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.968 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GB202
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.2
CUDA
12.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
