GeForce 210 vs GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 195W)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+8233%
3250
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
195W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GK104
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
