FirePro W5170M vs Radeon Pro W6600M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro W6600M Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (2034MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W5170M
1184
Radeon Pro W6600M
+515%
7290
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W5170M
788
Radeon Pro W6600M
+802%
7113
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1224 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
28
-
SM Count
66
640
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tropo
GPU Name
Navi 23
Tropo XT
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7
