FirePro W5170M vs Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A350M Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1150MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W5170M
1184
Arc A350M
+49%
1766
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W5170M
788
Arc A350M
+248%
2749
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Tropo
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tropo XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
