FirePro W4000 vs FirePro W4100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro W4000 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
FirePro W4100 Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
+96%
1267
FirePro W4100
645
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
