FirePro 2450 Multi View vs RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro 2450 Multi View Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
RTX A400 Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
RTX A400
+8356%
2706
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GA107
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
