Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison B200 SXM 192 GB vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

B200 SXM 192 GB vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

B200 SXM 192 GB Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.10TB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +2931%
62080
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2048

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jul 2022
Server Blackwell
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

96GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4.10TB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
1024
528
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
64
528
Tensor Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
35W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Blackwell
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
104 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
10.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net