Arc Pro A40 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A40 Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (2505MHz vs 1700MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40
3482
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+2515%
91060
3DMark Time Spy
Arc Pro A40
3328
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+688%
26240
OctaneBench
Arc Pro A40
411
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+159%
1068
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Dec 2022
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
142
1024
Shading Units
18176
64
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
8
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
AD102
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
AD102
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
