Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (2200MHz vs 1100MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+366%
3942
Iris Plus Graphics 640
845
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2017
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
6
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.690 TFLOPS
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
15W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
