Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
848 additional rendering cores
GeForce 320M Mac Edition Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+4231%
3942
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
91
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
23W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
