Arc A770 vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A770 Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9250 Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+1866%
19660
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
4096
Shading Units
800
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
RV770
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
