Arc A370M vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1680MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
3174
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+929%
32690
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
76
1024
Shading Units
9728
64
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
8
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
AD103
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
