Arc A370M vs P106M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1550MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
P106M Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+6%
3174
P106M
2974
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2019
Alchemist
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
9
1024
Shading Units
1152
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GP106
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
