H3C Magic BE18000 vs Xiaomi BE7000
We compared the H3C Magic BE18000 (BE18000) with Qualcomm IPQ9574 4-core processor and the Xiaomi BE7000 (BE7000) with Qualcomm IPQ9554 4-core processor. You will find out which router performs better in benchmark tests, wireless specifications, and other information.
Main Differences
H3C Magic BE18000 Advantages
Higher CPU Performance (2.2GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Higher Channel Bandwidth (320MHz vs 160)
Faster WAN Port (10GbE vs 2.5GbE)
Faster Wireless Speed (5765Mbps vs 5764Mbps)
Xiaomi BE7000 Advantages
Released later by 7 months
Faster LAN Port (2.5GbE vs 1GbE)
Score
benchmark
DMIPS performance
H3C Magic BE18000
+46%
42240
Xiaomi BE7000
28800
General
Jul 2022
Release Date
Feb 2023
Wi-Fi 7
Wireless Protocol
Wi-Fi 7
BE18000
Series
BE7000
CPU Performance
Qualcomm IPQ9574
Processor
Qualcomm IPQ9554
ARM Cortex-A73
CPU Architecture
ARM Cortex-A73
2.2 GHz x4
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz x4
256 MiB
Flash ROM
128 MiB
1 GiB
RAM
1 GiB
Radio Band 1
2.4 GHz
Frequency Band
2.4 GHz
Qualcomm QCN9224
Wireless Chip
Qualcomm QCN5024
1148 Mbps
Wireless Speed
1148 Mbps
4 spatial streams 4x4
MIMO Specification
4 spatial streams 4x4
Radio Band 2
5 GHz
Frequency Band
5.2 GHz
Qualcomm QCN9274
Wireless Chip
Qualcomm QCN6224
5765 Mbps
Wireless Speed
5764 Mbps
4 spatial streams 4x4
MIMO Specification
4 spatial streams 4x4
Radio Band 3
6 GHz
Frequency Band
-
Qualcomm QCN9274
Wireless Chip
-
11530 Mbps
Wireless Speed
-
4 spatial streams 4x4
MIMO Specification
-
Wireless Parameters
-
2.4G Signal Amplifier
4
-
5G Signal Booster
4
MU-MIMO
MIMO
-
4096
QAM Modulation
4096
Yes
MLO
Yes
320 MHz
Channel Bandwidth
160
LAN Parameters
Qualcomm IPQ9574
Switch Chip
Qualcomm IPQ9554
1 GbE x3
LAN Port
2.5 GbE x3
10 GbE x2
WAN Port
2.5 GbE x1
Miscellaneous
12 VDC, 4 A
Power
12 VDC, 3 A
1
USB Ports
1
-
Dimensions
408×133×177mm
