Acer Predator Connect W6 vs Xiaomi AX3000T
We compared the Acer Predator Connect W6 (AXE7800) with MediaTek MT7986A 4-core processor and the Xiaomi AX3000T (AX3000) with MediaTek MT7981BA 2-core processor. You will find out which router performs better in benchmark tests, wireless specifications, and other information.
Main Differences
Acer Predator Connect W6 Advantages
Higher CPU Performance (2.0GHz vs 1.3GHz)
Larger RAM (1GiB vs 256MiB)
Higher QAM Modulation (4096 vs 1024)
Faster WAN Port (2.5GbE vs 1GbE)
Faster Wireless Speed (4804Mbps vs 2402Mbps)
Xiaomi AX3000T Advantages
Released later by 6 months
Score
benchmark
DMIPS performance
Acer Predator Connect W6
+207%
18400
Xiaomi AX3000T
5980
General
Feb 2023
Release Date
Aug 2023
Wi-Fi 6
Wireless Protocol
Wi-Fi 6
AXE7800
Series
AX3000
Yes
3rd Party ROM Support
Yes
CPU Performance
MediaTek MT7986A
Processor
MediaTek MT7981BA
ARM Cortex-A53
CPU Architecture
ARM Cortex-A53 (Filogic 820)
2.0 GHz x4
CPU Performance
1.3 GHz x2
4 GiB
Flash ROM
128 MiB
1 GiB
RAM
256 MiB
Radio Band 1
2.4 GHz
Frequency Band
2.4 GHz
MediaTek MT7916
Wireless Chip
MediaTek MT7981BA
574 Mbps
Wireless Speed
574 Mbps
2 spatial streams 2x2
MIMO Specification
2 spatial streams 2x2
Radio Band 2
5 GHz
Frequency Band
5 GHz
MediaTek MT7986
Wireless Chip
MediaTek MT7981BA
4804 Mbps
Wireless Speed
2402 Mbps
4 spatial streams 4x4
MIMO Specification
2 spatial streams 2x3
Radio Band 3
6 GHz
Frequency Band
-
MediaTek MT7916
Wireless Chip
-
2402 Mbps
Wireless Speed
-
2 spatial streams 2x2
MIMO Specification
-
Wireless Parameters
-
MIMO
MU-MIMO
4096
QAM Modulation
1024
160 MHz
Channel Bandwidth
160 MHz
LAN Parameters
MediaTek MT7531
Switch Chip
MediaTek MT7531AE
1 GbE x4
LAN Port
1 GbE x3
2.5 GbE x1
WAN Port
1 GbE x1
Miscellaneous
-
Power
12 VDC, 1 A
1
USB Ports
-
10.43 x 10.24 x 4.37 inches
Dimensions
-
1.93 pounds
Weight
-
