Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 615 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel UHD Graphics 615 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 615
+280%
0.346 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-T
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
3
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.700 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
691.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
86.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Amber Lake GT2
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
