NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R7 260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+614%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 10
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.00 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.536 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
95W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Bonaire
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
