NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+3%
10.97 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 10
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
471 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
