NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (2640MHz vs 1531MHz)
Lower TDP (115W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050
+23%
13.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
2505 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
18
3584
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
115W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
AD107
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
