NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+1364%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE
0.749 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Nov 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
6
3584
Shading Units
288
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GF104
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
GF104-225-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
