NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+1946%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
27
3584
Shading Units
216
224
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GT200B
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
