NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+2734%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
TITAN X Pascal
+799%
9844
GeForce GTS 250
1094
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
16
3584
Shading Units
128
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
G92B
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
