NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+1686%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Cayman
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
