NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
3184 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+1669%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
400
224
TMUs
20
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
69W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Redwood
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
