NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+3016%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
48W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
RV730
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
