NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

VS

NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1770MHz vs 1455MHz)

More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)

3968 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

TITAN RTX +775%

16.31 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1050

1.862 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

TITAN RTX +760%

15148

GeForce GTX 1050

1760

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

TITAN RTX +750%

68

GeForce GTX 1050

8

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

TITAN RTX +588%

124

GeForce GTX 1050

18

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

TITAN RTX +454%

172

GeForce GTX 1050

31

GTA 5 1440p

TITAN RTX +242%

130

GeForce GTX 1050

38

GTA 5 1080p

TITAN RTX +20%

180

GeForce GTX 1050

149

TITAN RTX

VS

GeForce GTX 1050

Graphics Card

Dec 2018

Release Date

Oct 2016

GeForce 20

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz

Base Clock

1354 MHz

1770 MHz

Boost Clock

1455 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1752 MHz

Memory

24GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

384bit

Memory Bus

128bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

112.1GB/s

Render Config

72

SM Count

5

-

Compute Units

-

4608

Shading Units

640

288

TMUs

40

96

ROPs

32

576

Tensor Cores

-

72

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

46.56 GPixel/s

509.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

58.20 GTexel/s

32.62 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

29.10 GFLOPS

16.31 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.862 TFLOPS

509.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

58.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

GP107

TU102-400-A1

GPU Variant

GP107-300-A1

Turing

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

12 nm

Process Size

14 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

3.3 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

132 mm²

Board Design

280W

TDP

75W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

6.1

6.6

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

4

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

6

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

8

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

9

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

10

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX