NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2520MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+746%
92.9 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2016
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
28
18432
Shading Units
3584
576
TMUs
224
192
ROPs
96
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
250W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GP102
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
