NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 800W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
-
576
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
41W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
Floppy
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV530
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO
(215CADAKA24FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
