NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (2520MHz vs 1785MHz)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
More VRAM (141GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 1.15TB/s)
Lower TDP (600W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+54%
92.9 TFLOPS
H200 NVL
60.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2024
GeForce 40
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
132
18432
Shading Units
16896
576
TMUs
528
192
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
528
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
600W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GH100
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
80 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
