NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2520MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
17536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+3013%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
14
18432
Shading Units
896
576
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
75W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
TU117
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
