NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
18360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+49314%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
9
18432
Shading Units
72
576
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
43W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT215
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
