NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2520MHz vs 2050MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+1006%
92.9 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
8.397 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 40
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
2048
576
TMUs
128
192
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
256
144
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
130W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
DG2-256
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
