Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090 +114%
1.332 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
800W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy