Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 230W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 +737%
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy