NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1597MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
+3264%
16.35 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1245 MHz
Base Clock
-
1597 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
80
SM Count
8
5120
Shading Units
256
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
204.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
511.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
32.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
8.177 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
142W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Volta
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
