NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+770%
8.945 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
20
448
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
900W
TDP
100W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
