Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050 +137%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

900W
TDP
75W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy