NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
+122%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
900W
TDP
225W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
