Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1070
0.622 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +2121%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
7680
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

800W
TDP
500W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy