Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1329MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB +1565%
9.526 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB +3260%
1176
Quadro K2000M
35
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1190 MHz
Base Clock
-
1329 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

127.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
297.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
19.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.526 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
4.763 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GK107
GP100-893-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.0
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy