NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1480MHz vs 1180MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M6
+91%
3.625 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Tesla M6
+91%
3008
Quadro P1000
1572
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1180 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
1536
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
3.625 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
47W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GP107
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
