NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+548%
8.637 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
20
512
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
95W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
