NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
+2927%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
28W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
