Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
4672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +1274%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2019
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
5120
56
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GV100
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy