Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +975%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
350W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy