Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 +1483%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
4608
56
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy