Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +34%
5.299 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
2688
Shading Units
1920
224
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net